tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7078978919723737706.post1594214545033733343..comments2023-05-18T15:34:32.416+05:30Comments on Thoughts of Rising Gladiator: Supreme Court and its fallacy in understanding the Hindu epicRising Gladiatorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06960414887887382274noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7078978919723737706.post-71223140836997081302011-05-27T18:37:15.934+05:302011-05-27T18:37:15.934+05:30From when Dronacharya and Mahabharata is a history...From when Dronacharya and Mahabharata is a history to Hon sc of India ! If it is a history, then this criticism has some significance, else why they behave like ladies who cry seing starpllus soaps ! <br /><br />Jokes apart, the real issue is to somehow defame the religion. No one is classified good or bad in Mahabharatha. Vyasa just narrated what had happened during that time, good and bad is for us to distinguish.<br /><br /> Sage veda vyasa , valmeeki if they were discriminated against by the ruling class or brahmins for thier birth as tribals, we would not have such beautiful scriptures like mahabharata and ramayana !nationalizerhttp://nationalizer.orgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7078978919723737706.post-24864775827883340862011-02-08T14:44:13.499+05:302011-02-08T14:44:13.499+05:30@Aditya: Thanx for commenting; actually u rite .. ...@Aditya: Thanx for commenting; actually u rite .. insitution shuld stay frm commenting with superficial knowledge n drag itself in unnecessary controversy<br /><br />@sudeepti: my point was to argue with SC tht thr culd b well another angle and SC shuld desist frm commenting without full knowledge<br /><br />@manoj: thanks for commenting, while i respect ur disagreement; My point has always been, thr is grey area surrounding Dhronacharya hence he can get benefit of doubt and hence SC shuld nt drag scriptures without having full knowledge about it also when the reference is not requiredRising Gladiatorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06960414887887382274noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7078978919723737706.post-86626136362920730842011-02-04T13:53:37.992+05:302011-02-04T13:53:37.992+05:30I am not agree with your opinion its ok Eklavya ha...I am not agree with your opinion its ok Eklavya has did mistake he didnt permission of Dronacharya but giving his thumb he prooved himself, I also follower of Hinduism its true ppl r using these topic against hinduism but i want to say one thing tribals r also hinduManojhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14088772990395692913noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7078978919723737706.post-63888397020161773702011-01-17T23:03:10.566+05:302011-01-17T23:03:10.566+05:30For once i do not agree to what you have written. ...For once i do not agree to what you have written. I feel you are missing a very important point here... and mocking religion and all... well pointing out a fallacy isn't mocking.Panda https://www.blogger.com/profile/02734801409857670166noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7078978919723737706.post-10409854004890416972011-01-06T20:20:23.680+05:302011-01-06T20:20:23.680+05:30Agree with you on this one.
While I dont have an...Agree with you on this one. <br /><br />While I dont have any issues with anyone mocking hinduism or any religion for that matter coz I just dont give a damn about religions. <br /><br />But it is definitely sad to see an institution of such high value as the Supreme Court waste its time and worse get in the muddy waters of religion. This is entirely pointless and should have been avoided by the Supreme CourtAdityaNayakhttp://www.adityakumarnayak.comnoreply@blogger.com